Behind Google search - Udi Manber interview
Today I came across an interesting interview with Google guru Udi Manber. Udi is the Vice President for search quality at Google. It is challenging position considering the monetary value associated with search engine ranking. There are two things which caught my attention from the interview,
So let me first tell you about Google. At Google we do not manually change results. For example, if we find for a particular query that result No. 4 should be result No. 1, we do not have the capability to manually change it. We made that decision not to put that capability in the algorithm—we have to go and actually change the algorithm. That is, we have to find what weakness in the algorithm caused that result and find a general solution to that, evaluate whether a general solution really works and if it’s better, and then launch a general solution. That makes the process slower, but it puts a lot more discipline on us and makes it more unbiased.
So what this means is that Google algorithm is continuously changed to tackle spammers, link exchanges, link sales etc. So if someone is clever enough to circumvent the quality parameters of Google, they fix it in the algorithm rather than specifically penalizing the guy. Of course, in extreme cases the site is taken out from search results!
Yes, I told you we launched our 450 improvements. When we decide to launch something, we have a weekly meeting where all those things come together and we look at all the evaluations and we make decisions—revenues and any effects on ads do not come into those meetings. We don’t even know what the effects are.
This is another interesting aspect. Even though majority of Google revenue comes from advertising, the search algorithm is focused only on search quality. It is hard to believe that search engine enhancements are in no way impacted by Google’s interest in the advertising revenue.
I have been experimenting with Google search algorithm for sometime now. One thing is certain. If you have quality articles which are not too short, they get ranked well even if you don’t have many links! Also there seems to be some algorithm which ranks new good content very high initially. During this initial period the content automatically gets linked by a lot of people who reads it through search results. If the content is not good, it won’t get linked and the ranking drops gradually.






I wanted to create a poll on this blog and then I realized that there is no such thing as a perfect poll! The main problem is, how do you prevent bogus or duplicate votes?
These days, spammers are everywhere. The latest spam to hit Orkut is the “iREEADD THIS” spam. I got this message from 5 of my Orkut friends. This clearly shows how easy it is to mislead people! Here is what the mail contains,



